DOC: cp missing manage_xticks from bxp to boxplot docstring [backport]
#4370
+3
−0
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Good catch! |
manage_xticks from bxp to boxplot docstringmanage_xticks from bxp to boxplot docstring [backport!
manage_xticks from bxp to boxplot docstring [backport!manage_xticks from bxp to boxplot docstring [backport]
|
The travis failure appears to be unrelated. Something to do with stix fonts... |
tacaswell
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2015
DOC : copy missing `manage_xticks` from `bxp` to `boxplot` docstring
tacaswell
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2015
DOC : copy missing `manage_xticks` from `bxp` to `boxplot` docstring
|
|
|
@johnyf Thanks! Documentation fixes are just as (or more!) important that code fixes. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
An entry for
manage_xticksappears to not have been added in bdda1d5 that created this argument. Not sure if this was intentional, but from the duplication of information in the docstrings ofpyplot.bxpandpyplot.boxplot, likely not. Relevant discussion in #2922.