-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.9k
Enh mappable remapper #4490
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Enh mappable remapper #4490
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
47b7fc8
ENH/RFC: decorators to deal with data frames
tacaswell 270144b
ENH: add apply version of the decorators
tacaswell 6657e65
DOC: fix up indentation in docstrings
tacaswell 08edd22
MNT: settle on using np.asarray on input
tacaswell 48d1cfa
DOC: updates docstrings
tacaswell bbd7356
MNT: use `asannayarray` instead of `asarray`
tacaswell 1e5ae2e
DOC: make sphinx happy
tacaswell File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
ENH: add apply version of the decorators
- Loading branch information
commit 270144b01a9da4e691390ef2009df84a6e9ee23d
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why are you using the
values
attribute for the kwargs cases but not for the args cases?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oversight, but I am not fully sure which way is better.
.values
gets us a numpy array full-stop, but just [] gets use aSeries
which more-or-less behave like a numpy array.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not using
.values
also means that these decorators will work with dicts of numpy arrays. It might be better to usenp.asarray
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Omitting
.values
also means it will work with a numpy structured array; but I'm not sure if there would be any point in this.Maybe use
np.asanyarray
in case something might yield a masked array?I presume with a DataFrame, missing data will end up as NaN after conversion, correct?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it is always NaN internally in pandas and they don't do masking/sparse at all