Skip to content

Fix Boxplot docs to conform to numpydoc #6240

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

jenshnielsen
Copy link
Member

  • Additional Options is not a valid numpy doc section so this whole section gets dropped here I have converted this to Other Parameters which is valid.
  • The section below does not confirm to numpy doc so I have converted the parameters to numpydoc format. This makes it slightly more verbose but renders correctly. I could be convinced to drop this if needed.

@QuLogic QuLogic added this to the 1.5.2 (Critical bug fix release) milestone Mar 29, 2016
@tacaswell
Copy link
Member

These docstrings should probably exactly match the docs of bxp.

@jenshnielsen
Copy link
Member Author

Makes sense. Have we decided on a standard for documenting optional parameters and default values. boxplot and bxp does it in two different ways.

@mdboom mdboom modified the milestones: 2.0.1 (next bug fix release), 1.5.2 (Critical bug fix release) May 16, 2016
@tacaswell tacaswell closed this Jul 3, 2016
@tacaswell
Copy link
Member

@jenshnielsen Can you re-open this against 2.x or master?

@QuLogic
Copy link
Member

QuLogic commented Aug 8, 2016

@jenshnielsen was this ever re-opened?

NelleV added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2016
Fix Boxplot docs to conform to numpydoc (rebase #6240)
@QuLogic QuLogic modified the milestones: 2.0.1 (next bug fix release), unassigned Dec 7, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants