-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.9k
TST: skip broken test #6263
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
TST: skip broken test #6263
Conversation
e37ec17
to
14db594
Compare
Bah, this order of the decorators does not work because the failure happens in the outer decorator so barfs on not failing. Ordering the decorators the other order fails on definition. |
I think you could just raise |
The only downside of that is that the knownfailure could hang around forever, the decorator checks that it actually fails in the cases where it is known to fail |
This test only over passed due to an error arising from a bug in numpy's divmod being fixed (numpy/numpy#6127). See matplotlib#5950
14db594
to
26cba4b
Compare
This has un-broken all of our CI. I have it tagged an 1.5.2 to backport it back to 1.5.x (as eventually we will end up with np1.11 in our test for all running branches. |
👍 for 1.5.x we likely need to do the same with test_bbox_inches_tight_raster since #6192 wasn't backported onto 1.5.x |
…_test TST: skip broken test
Backported to 1.5.x as 44e7356 |
…ding_issue_test TST: skip broken test
Cannot use the decorator for similar reasons as matplotlib#6263
This test only over passed due to an error arising from a bug
in numpy's divmod being fixed (numpy/numpy#6127).
See #5950
attn @jenshnielsen