Skip to content

Do not hardcode fill=False in mark_inset #9615

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 29, 2017

Conversation

ImportanceOfBeingErnest
Copy link
Member

There should not be any reason to hardcode fill=False in mark_inset. This prevents having a filled BboxPatch. With the proposed change, something like

mark_inset(ax,axins,loc1=1,loc2=3, fill=True, edgecolor="k", facecolor="lightgrey")

will be possible and would look like

image

(See this stackoverflow question)

PR Summary

PR Checklist

  • Has Pytest style unit tests
  • Code is PEP 8 compliant
  • New features are documented, with examples if plot related
  • Documentation is sphinx and numpydoc compliant
  • Added an entry to doc/users/next_whats_new/ if major new feature (follow instructions in README.rst there)
  • Documented in doc/api/api_changes.rst if API changed in a backward-incompatible way

There should not be any reason to hardcode fill=False in `mark_inset`. This prevents having a filled Bbox_Patch. With the proposed change, something like `mark_inset(ax,axins,loc1=1,loc2=3, fill=True, edgecolor="k", facecolor="lightgrey")` will again be possible (it was in v1.3 but got broken at some point).
@tacaswell tacaswell added this to the v2.2 milestone Oct 29, 2017
@tacaswell
Copy link
Member

Thanks @ImportanceOfBeingErnest

The travis failure is the pandas 0.21 issue.

@QuLogic QuLogic merged commit 6f8a17e into matplotlib:master Oct 29, 2017
@tacaswell
Copy link
Member

Thanks @ImportanceOfBeingErnest ! Hopefully we will hear from you again.

@QuLogic QuLogic modified the milestones: needs sorting, v2.2.0 Feb 12, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants