-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.2k
Add DEVEBOX_H750 Board #15191
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add DEVEBOX_H750 Board #15191
Conversation
Using the multicore lockout feature in the general atomic section makes it much more difficult to get correct. Signed-off-by: Damien George <damien@micropython.org>
These allow entering/exiting a mutex and also disabling/restoring interrupts, in an atomic way. Signed-off-by: Damien George <damien@micropython.org>
Prior to this commit there is a potential deadlock in mp_thread_begin_atomic_section(), when obtaining the atomic_mutex, in the following situation: - main thread calls mp_thread_begin_atomic_section() (for whatever reason, doesn't matter) - the second core is running so the main thread grabs the mutex via the call mp_thread_mutex_lock(&atomic_mutex, 1), and this succeeds - before the main thread has a chance to run save_and_disable_interrupts() a USB IRQ comes in and the main thread jumps off to process this IRQ - that USB processing triggers a call to the dcd_event_handler() wrapper from commit bcbdee2 - that then calls mp_sched_schedule_node() - that then attempts to obtain the atomic section, calling mp_thread_begin_atomic_section() - that call then blocks trying to obtain atomic_mutex - core0 is now deadlocked on itself, because the main thread has the mutex but the IRQ handler (which preempted the main thread) is blocked waiting for the mutex, which will never be free The solution in this commit is to use mutex enter/exit functions that also atomically disable/restore interrupts. Fixes issues micropython#12980 and micropython#13288. Signed-off-by: Damien George <damien@micropython.org>
Signed-off-by: Damien George <damien@micropython.org>
Signed-off-by: Nicko van Someren <nicko@nicko.org>
Do not wait in the worst case up to the timeout. Fixes issue micropython#13377. Signed-off-by: robert-hh <robert@hammelrath.com>
The SysTick_Config function must use the system/CPU clock to configure the ticks. Signed-off-by: iabdalkader <i.abdalkader@gmail.com>
Switch the RTC clock source to Sub-clock (XCIN). This board has an accurate LSE crystal, and it should be used for the RTC clock source. Signed-off-by: iabdalkader <i.abdalkader@gmail.com>
Adds support to asyncio.gather() for the case that one or more (or all) sub-tasks finish and/or raise an exception before the gather starts. Signed-off-by: Damien George <damien@micropython.org>
Signed-off-by: Kwabena W. Agyeman <kwagyeman@live.com>
Prior to this commit it would skip every second cipher returned from mbedtls. The corresponding test is also updated and now passes on esp32, rp2, stm32 and unix. Signed-off-by: Damien George <damien@micropython.org>
These separate drivers must share the DMA resource with each other. Fixes issue micropython#13380. Signed-off-by: Damien George <damien@micropython.org>
If a return is executed within the try block of a try-finally then the return value is stored on the top of the Python stack during the execution of the finally block. In this case the Python stack is one larger than it normally would be in the finally block. Prior to this commit, the compiler was not taking this case into account and could have a Python stack overflow if the Python stack used by the finally block was more than that used elsewhere in the function. In such a scenario the last argument of the function would be clobbered by the top-most temporary value used in the deepest Python expression/statement. This commit fixes that case by making sure enough Python stack is allocated to the function. Fixes issue micropython#13562. Signed-off-by: Damien George <damien@micropython.org>
Tested on Portenta C33 with AT24256B (addrsize=16) and SSD1306. Fixes issue micropython#13280. Signed-off-by: Takeo Takahashi <takeo.takahashi.xv@renesas.com>
The pending_value_handle needs to be freed and reset before calling mp_bluetooth_gattc_on_read_write_status(), which will call the Python IRQ handler, which may in turn call back into BTstack to perform an action like a write. In that case the pending_value_handle will need to be available for the write/read/etc to proceed. Fixes issue micropython#13611. Signed-off-by: Damien George <damien@micropython.org>
Similar to the previous commit but for MP_BLUETOOTH_IRQ_GATTC_READ_DONE: the pending_value_handle needs to be reset before calling mp_bluetooth_gattc_on_read_write_status(), which will call the Python IRQ handler, which may in turn call back into BTstack to perform an action like a write. In that case the pending_value_handle will need to be available for the write/read/etc to proceed. Fixes issue micropython#13634. Signed-off-by: Damien George <damien@micropython.org>
In case callbacks must run (eg a disconnect event happens during the deinit) and the GIL must be obtained to run the callback. Fixes part of issue micropython#12349. Signed-off-by: Damien George <damien@micropython.org>
The Python BLE IRQ handler will most likely run on the NimBLE task, so its C stack must be large enough to accommodate reasonably complicated Python code (eg a few call depths). So increase this stack size. Also increase the headroom from 1024 to 2048 bytes. This is needed because (1) the esp32 architecture uses a fair amount of stack in general; and (2) by the time execution gets to setting the Python stack top via `mp_stack_set_top()` in this interlock code, about 600 bytes of stack are already used, which reduces the amount available for Python. Fixes issue micropython#12349. Signed-off-by: Damien George <damien@micropython.org>
Signed-off-by: Damien George <damien@micropython.org>
new file: ports/stm32/boards/DEVEBOX_H750VB/board_init.c new file: ports/stm32/boards/DEVEBOX_H750VB/mpconfigboard.h new file: ports/stm32/boards/DEVEBOX_H750VB/mpconfigboard.mk new file: ports/stm32/boards/DEVEBOX_H750VB/pins.csv new file: ports/stm32/boards/DEVEBOX_H750VB/stm32h7xx_hal_conf.h
It is not clear for me for which MCU the PR was intended. You use both STM32H743VIT6 and STM32H750VB. The H750VB's flash is not large enough for the MicroPython firmware. So I assume you worked with the H743VI. Then you should use this name consistently. |
No description provided.