refactor: use union type in DateConstructor
#21757
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
DateConstructorDateConstructor
Add support for union types in `DateConstructor` This will add support for something like the below; ` let date; string | number; const date = new Date(x); ` Closes: microsoft#21758
|
We need another overload as well in |
…er individually Closes: microsoft#20900
|
Pushed an update |
|
thanks! |
This was referenced Apr 6, 2018
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add support for union types in
DateConstructorThis will add support for something like the below;
let date; string | number; const date = new Date(x);Fixes #21758
Fixes #20900