Skip to content

Remove debris from smart send experiment #24957

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

anthonykim1
Copy link

This should've been part of #23067

Removing debris, making package.json look cleaner.
/cc @cwebster-99

@anthonykim1 anthonykim1 added debt Covers everything internal: CI, testing, refactoring of the codebase, etc. area-repl labels Apr 2, 2025
@anthonykim1 anthonykim1 self-assigned this Apr 2, 2025
@anthonykim1 anthonykim1 marked this pull request as ready for review April 2, 2025 14:41
@anthonykim1 anthonykim1 added this to the April 2025 milestone Apr 2, 2025
Copy link

⚠️ This PR originates from a fork. Due to security restrictions, pipelines from forks are no longer triggered automatically. Learn more.

If the changes appear safe, you can manually trigger the pipeline by commenting /AzurePipelines run.

1 similar comment
Copy link

⚠️ This PR originates from a fork. Due to security restrictions, pipelines from forks are no longer triggered automatically. Learn more.

If the changes appear safe, you can manually trigger the pipeline by commenting /AzurePipelines run.

@anthonykim1 anthonykim1 added skip package*.json package.json and package-lock.json don't both need updating skip-issue-check labels Apr 2, 2025
@anthonykim1 anthonykim1 merged commit affbd1b into microsoft:main Apr 2, 2025
50 of 54 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-repl debt Covers everything internal: CI, testing, refactoring of the codebase, etc. skip package*.json package.json and package-lock.json don't both need updating skip-issue-check
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants