Skip to content

Add header to MCP server to expand authentication capabilities #229

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

termixai-it
Copy link

Motivation and Context

This change introduces header-based authentication for MCP, improving security and access control. By requiring authentication headers in requests, we ensure that only authorized users can interact with MCP services.

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Added unit tests to verify authentication header validation.
  • Tested authentication flow in a real application environment.
  • Ensured that unauthorized requests are correctly rejected while maintaining backward compatibility.

Breaking Changes

No breaking changes; existing authentication mechanisms remain functional, and this addition does not affect previous implementations.

Types of changes

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional Context

This implementation enhances security while keeping the request structure simple and efficient. No changes were made to the core authentication logic beyond requiring the new header.

Copy link
Member

@jspahrsummers jspahrsummers left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please share more about the motivation for this change. As it stands, this isn't compatible with all transports, so it's extra important to have detailed justification and examples of how you'd use it.

@perryrh0dan
Copy link

This merge request would help me too. I would like to forward the authorization headers from the user to the actual tool use. So that the tool request can be done "in the name" of the original user. The backend is filtering out data based on the users permissions so i can not just use a service account for that.

@kevin1027sloth
Copy link

The addition of this feature is proposed by our team, the starting point is to strengthen the ability of mcp, and then the actual use of the process, we hope that he can be used as we use http network requests, you can isolate the user's request for business data and some of the system data, you can do more things, for example, we can add the header object to add sourceclient to determine the source of the user , you can add the header object auth_token to do the login credentials to pass , you can add any field to do the B-side of the user wants to do things , such as adding a parameter encryption field , you can do some of the anti-climbing mechanism and so on.

Pizzaface pushed a commit to RewstApp/mcp-inspector that referenced this pull request May 2, 2025
…/dependabot/npm_and_yarn/npm_and_yarn-7631eb0223

Bump vite from 5.4.12 to 5.4.15 in the npm_and_yarn group across 1 directory
@stenebenau
Copy link

Hi There.

This is a much needed feature. We are linking our internal backoffice systems via an MCP SSE server to our Chat Clients. The user is therefore able to search in different backend systems. However we need to be able to isolate the user via a header. If we have that header available in the Tool/Resource context we can do a Search/Fetch API call on the backend with that specific user context and therefore only returning data which is accessible to that user.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants