Few more typo fixes

nd-crane · Aug 17, 2023 · 1a0070f · 1a0070f
1 parent 5880fa7
commit 1a0070f
Showing 1 changed file with 2 additions and 2 deletions.
diff --git a/07-how-random-forests-really-work.ipynb b/07-how-random-forests-really-work.ipynb
@@ -892,7 +892,7 @@
     "\n",
     "We've just re-invented the [OneR](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1022631118932) classifier (or at least, a minor variant of it), which was found to be one of the most effective classifiers in real-world datasets, compared to the algorithms in use in 1993. Since it's so simple and surprisingly effective, it makes for a great *baseline* -- that is, a starting point that you can use to compare your more sophisticated models to.\n",
     "\n",
-    "We found earlier that out OneR rule had an error of around `0.215`, so we'll keep that in mind as we try out more sophisticated approaches."
+    "We found earlier that our OneR rule had an error of around `0.215`, so we'll keep that in mind as we try out more sophisticated approaches."
    ]
   },
   {
@@ -908,7 +908,7 @@
    "source": [
     "How can we improve our OneR classifier, which predicts survival based only on `Sex`?\n",
     "\n",
-    "How about we take each of our two groups, `female` and `male`, and create one more binary split for each of them. That is: fine the single best split for females, and the single best split for males. To do this, all we have to do is repeat the previous section's steps, once for males, and once for females.\n",
+    "How about we take each of our two groups, `female` and `male`, and create one more binary split for each of them. That is: find the single best split for females, and the single best split for males. To do this, all we have to do is repeat the previous section's steps, once for males, and once for females.\n",
     "\n",
     "First, we'll remove `Sex` from the list of possible splits (since we've already used it, and there's only one possible split for that binary column), and create our two groups:"
    ]