Skip to content

ENH: Implement ITK densefields checks vs antsApplyTransformsToPoints #277

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 14, 2025

Conversation

oesteban
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 13, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.58%. Comparing base (5031627) to head (d48a739).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #277   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.58%   95.58%           
=======================================
  Files          16       16           
  Lines        1993     1993           
  Branches      268      268           
=======================================
  Hits         1905     1905           
  Misses         65       65           
  Partials       23       23           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 95.56% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@oesteban oesteban force-pushed the enh/test-vs-antsApplyTransformsToPoints branch 2 times, most recently from 72393e4 to d48a739 Compare August 14, 2025 07:35
@oesteban oesteban merged commit e7944ef into master Aug 14, 2025
13 checks passed
@oesteban oesteban deleted the enh/test-vs-antsApplyTransformsToPoints branch August 14, 2025 07:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant