Attachment added by @rgommers on 2009-11-02: docstandard_modules.patch

@charris wrote on 2010-04-24

I think routine listings needs to be expanded a bit. There are three things that are likely to be found in modules that aren't in functions: classes, functions, and constants. I'm not sure how these should be handled, but we need a policy and an example.

Milestone changed to Unscheduled by @rgommers on 2010-05-30

trac user dgoldsmith wrote on 2010-05-30

Can/should we expand this to "doc standard for modules, sub-packages, and packages," or are there things about the latter two which make them require their own standard(s)?

@mwiebe wrote on 2011-03-25

Should this patch go into 1.6?

@rgommers wrote on 2011-03-25

I'm working on this, together with the other patches for the doc standard: #1763, #2121, #2098, #2106. It doesn't have to be backported to 1.6, the document in master is the only interesting one.

@rgommers wrote on 2011-03-29

committed with minor changes (emphasized routine listings more in response to Charles' comment) in b11ae17

Milestone changed to NumPy 2.0 by @mwiebe on 2011-05-31