Skip to content

ENH: Add density argument to histogramdd. #11529

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

eric-wieser
Copy link
Member

@eric-wieser eric-wieser commented Jul 8, 2018

A new density argument is added to histogramdd. It is an alias for the existing normed argument and provides commonality with the histogram function in which the incorrectly implemented normed argument has been replaced by density.

Fixes gh-4371.

Less contentious version of #11397

@charris charris changed the title MAINT: Rename histogramdd's normed argument to density, to match histogram ENH: Add density argument to histogramdd. Jul 8, 2018
@charris charris added this to the 1.15.0 release milestone Jul 8, 2018
@charris charris merged commit a44b61c into numpy:maintenance/1.15.x Jul 8, 2018
@charris
Copy link
Member

charris commented Jul 8, 2018

Thanks Eric.

@charris
Copy link
Member

charris commented Jul 8, 2018

I've marked this for a forward-port.

@eric-wieser
Copy link
Member Author

This is another trivial-port branch that needs no rebase

@charris
Copy link
Member

charris commented Jul 8, 2018

So we just need to change the base branch?

@charris
Copy link
Member

charris commented Jul 8, 2018

I think it would be good if you just resubmitted it as a new PR against master.

@eric-wieser
Copy link
Member Author

Yes, just resubmit the PR with the same source branch, but targeting a different base branch. I've gone ahead and done that at #11531

@eric-wieser
Copy link
Member Author

Marking as a backport to indicate it made it to master too

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants