-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11.1k
DOC: document how to skip CI jobs #18343
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
close/reopen |
A bunch of tests timed out after 72 hours (so they claimed). Not sure what was going on with that. |
Something is off. The skip for azure did not work |
This is expected, see the docs in the PR.
There was no skip for shippable, so this is also as expected.
This I did not expect, will look into it. |
I did see a jFrog (new owner of Shippable) app for Github actions in the marketplace. jFrog seems to supply an interface to AWS, Azure, or Google, but I'm not clear on how it should be used. |
@rgommers did you figure out why github actions ran? |
I didn't, no time to look into it. |
We removed Shippable from the CI testing and now rely on TravisCI for arm64 testing. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Thanks Ralf.
(I haven't merged because I'm not sure what caused the CirceCI checks to fail.)
Looks like the CircleCI debian image needs to be updated? Not sure why this is only showing up here, though. |
This is a follow-up to numpygh-18333. Self-test: docs get built on CircleCI, so let's skip the other platforms: [skip github] [skip azurepipelines] [skip appveyor] [skip travis]
Probably some ancient issue, I just rebased on main, lets see. |
I guess we still have the question of why the github actions tests and the Travis CI tests ran for this PR even though a commit includes |
[skip github] [skip travis]
I tried adding
to the second commit as well at least, lets see if it does something (the docs say azure won't work anyway). |
I have to admit, it would be a lot easier if we could have something like But, I suppose that is just dreaming :). |
Thanks @rgommers. This documents how we hope it works, we can iterate in the future to make it more accurate if something is off. |
This is a follow-up to gh-18333.
Self-test: docs get built on CircleCI, so let's skip the other platforms:
[skip github]
[skip azurepipelines]
[skip appveyor]
[skip travis]