Skip to content

CI: Bump debug test to ubuntu-latest/22.04 rather than 20.04 #23026

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 17, 2023

Conversation

seberg
Copy link
Member

@seberg seberg commented Jan 17, 2023

This bumps the armv7_simd_test and debug one to use newer python versions as they were still on 3.8.


Removes the remaining Python 3.8 jobs, I think both are on 3.10 after this (which seems fine). @seiko2plus do the simd job changes make sense?

(This is split out from gh-23020)

This bumps the `armv7_simd_test` and `debug` one to use newer python
versions as they were still on 3.8.
@seberg
Copy link
Member Author

seberg commented Jan 17, 2023

I spend way too much time trying to get a Python 3.9 working on focal for the armv7_simd_test job... I see no reason to do so?

@seberg
Copy link
Member Author

seberg commented Jan 17, 2023

Something is weird with github, maybe just check gh-23020 for what this commit does... EDIT: I mean for the CI result, since it is missing here.

@charris
Copy link
Member

charris commented Jan 17, 2023

close/reopen

@charris charris closed this Jan 17, 2023
@charris charris reopened this Jan 17, 2023
@charris charris merged commit 9b6a7b4 into numpy:main Jan 17, 2023
@charris
Copy link
Member

charris commented Jan 17, 2023

Thanks Sebastian.

@seberg seberg deleted the bump-ci branch January 17, 2023 17:32
@rgommers
Copy link
Member

The debug build seems to be failing, I've seen it 3 times now on gh-23066 and gh-23067, and I'm fairly sure that those PRs are not the cause. Anyone have an idea on what may be off here?

@seberg
Copy link
Member Author

seberg commented Jan 23, 2023

Seems like an assert somewhere that fails randomly (correctly or not). Might even be the same as gh-23037.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants