-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.8k
BUG: Ensure MaskedArray.flat can access single items #4585
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
masked
is masked scalar, right? Why is that the right thing here?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Or perhaps a better question is, does
isinstance(_mask, ndarray)
catch all the alternatives.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I just tried
ma.flat.maskiter[1]
,[:1]
, and.next()
and it would seemisinstance(_mask, ndarray)
catches all the alternatives. Of course, I could also put it in a try/except, or turn the if statement around,if isinstance(_mask, np.bool_)
; perhaps the latter is clearest?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The latter might be better, it's sort of six of one, half dozen of the other. The underlying type of
masked
isfloat64
, does that change the previous output type?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the advantage of testing for
np.bool_
is mostly that it is clearer why one has to do something special. As for previous output type, there was none -- one would get an exception! Of course, not so odd this wasn't caught, as most people would useflat
only for the iterator.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I confess I don't really understand what is going on here, particularly this bit
_mask.shape = result.shape
. Is this some sort of broadcasting? What is the relation of the two iterators? I could study the code, but the easier route is to ask you ;) Maybe a comment would be helpful.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I do not really understand either how the two iterators could return something with a different shape, but worry there is a good reason, but one not necessarily covered by the relatively sparse tests. I checked who last changed the lines with
git blame
and it seems to be @pierregm - Pierre: this is aboutMaskedIterator.__getitem__
; could you comment?