Skip to content

Conversation

anik120
Copy link
Contributor

@anik120 anik120 commented Aug 20, 2025

Manual cherry-pick of #1047

rashmigottipati and others added 3 commits August 20, 2025 13:28
Signed-off-by: Anik Bhattacharjee <anbhatta@gmail.com>
Upstream-repository: operator-registry
Upstream-commit: 919aefdce3f4d6b77c3872df249815d20749db94
Signed-off-by: Rashmi Gottipati <chowdary.grashmi@gmail.com>
Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: d7aaeb11ab80f862fc9c70dfb7865158bb67e28c
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 20, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: anik120

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 20, 2025
@perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

2 similar comments
@perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@anik120
Copy link
Contributor Author

anik120 commented Aug 21, 2025

/retest-required

1 similar comment
@anik120
Copy link
Contributor Author

anik120 commented Aug 21, 2025

/retest-required

@perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

1 similar comment
@perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@oceanc80
Copy link
Contributor

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Aug 25, 2025
@perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@anik120
Copy link
Contributor Author

anik120 commented Aug 27, 2025

/test e2e-gcp-olm

@grokspawn
Copy link
Contributor

This is the failure case that https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-57092 was written to address.
Overriding.

/override prow/e2e-gcp-olm

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 27, 2025

@grokspawn: /override requires failed status contexts, check run or a prowjob name to operate on.
The following unknown contexts/checkruns were given:

  • prow/e2e-gcp-olm

Only the following failed contexts/checkruns were expected:

  • ci/prow/e2e-gcp-console-olm
  • ci/prow/e2e-gcp-olm
  • ci/prow/e2e-gcp-olm-flaky
  • ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn
  • ci/prow/e2e-upgrade
  • ci/prow/images
  • ci/prow/periodics-images
  • ci/prow/unit-api
  • ci/prow/unit-olm
  • ci/prow/unit-psm
  • ci/prow/unit-registry
  • ci/prow/verify
  • pull-ci-openshift-operator-framework-olm-main-e2e-gcp-console-olm
  • pull-ci-openshift-operator-framework-olm-main-e2e-gcp-olm
  • pull-ci-openshift-operator-framework-olm-main-e2e-gcp-olm-flaky
  • pull-ci-openshift-operator-framework-olm-main-e2e-gcp-ovn
  • pull-ci-openshift-operator-framework-olm-main-e2e-upgrade
  • pull-ci-openshift-operator-framework-olm-main-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-operator-framework-olm-main-periodics-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-operator-framework-olm-main-unit-api
  • pull-ci-openshift-operator-framework-olm-main-unit-olm
  • pull-ci-openshift-operator-framework-olm-main-unit-psm
  • pull-ci-openshift-operator-framework-olm-main-unit-registry
  • pull-ci-openshift-operator-framework-olm-main-verify
  • tide

If you are trying to override a checkrun that has a space in it, you must put a double quote on the context.

In response to this:

This is the failure case that https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-57092 was written to address.
Overriding.

/override prow/e2e-gcp-olm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@grokspawn
Copy link
Contributor

/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-olm

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 27, 2025

@grokspawn: Overrode contexts on behalf of grokspawn: ci/prow/e2e-gcp-olm

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-olm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 27, 2025

@anik120: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-olm 3497076 link true /test e2e-gcp-olm

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@grokspawn
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 27, 2025
@Xia-Zhao-rh
Copy link

Test PASS
/label qe-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR label Aug 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.