Skip to content

Conversation

lu-yg
Copy link
Collaborator

@lu-yg lu-yg commented Feb 6, 2025

English | 简体中文

PR

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • The commit message follows our Commit Message Guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
  • Built its own designer, fully self-validated

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

Background and solution

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced validation to ensure only groups with valid identifiers proceed.
    • Streamlined deployment processing by removing redundant result handling.
  • New Features

    • Introduced improved query filtering with consolidated conditional logic for more flexible group selection.
    • Added a new select method for querying block groups based on specified conditions.

lu-yg and others added 30 commits December 26, 2024 00:15
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 6, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request modifies the control flow in two service implementations and updates a mapper XML. In the BlockGroupServiceImpl, an additional condition checks whether the first element of the result list has a non-null ID before proceeding. In the BlockServiceImpl, the return statement after updating the block is removed, altering the method’s output handling. The BlockGroupMapper.xml simplifies conditional SQL logic using a <choose> structure and adds a new select query.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.../BlockGroupServiceImpl.java Modified the getBlockGroupByIdsOrAppId method to add a condition that checks if the first element’s id is null in addition to verifying if the result list is empty.
.../BlockServiceImpl.java Removed the return statement for the result of updateBlockById in the deploy method, altering how the method’s outcome is handled.
.../BlockGroupMapper.xml Replaced dual <if> conditions with a <choose> structure in the queryBlockGroupAndBlockById select statement and added a new select query queryBlockGroupByCondition that leverages BlockGroupByCondition SQL fragment for filtering results.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Caller as Client/Application
    participant BGService as BlockGroupServiceImpl
    participant DB as Database

    Caller->>BGService: getBlockGroupByIdsOrAppId(ids)
    BGService->>DB: Query block groups by IDs
    DB-->>BGService: Return blockGroupsListResult
    BGService->>BGService: Check if list is empty or first element id is null
    alt List empty or first element id is null
        BGService-->>Caller: Return early (or handle accordingly)
    else Valid list with id present
        BGService-->>Caller: Proceed with further processing
    end
Loading
sequenceDiagram
    participant Caller as Client/Application
    participant BService as BlockServiceImpl
    participant DB as Database

    Caller->>BService: deploy(blockBuildDto)
    BService->>DB: updateBlockById(blockBuildDto)
    DB-->>BService: Update result
    BService-->>Caller: (No return value due to removal of return statement)
Loading

Possibly related PRs

  • fix: Modify block group mapper #169: The changes in the BlockGroupServiceImpl class's getBlockGroupByIdsOrAppId method are related to the modifications in the SQL queries of the BlockGroupMapper.xml file, as both involve the handling of block group data.
  • fix: Modify block create and update api #171: The changes in the BlockServiceImpl class to transition from BlockDto to BlockParam are directly related to the changes in the retrieved PR, which also involves updating the API to utilize BlockParam.

Suggested reviewers

  • rhlin

Poem

Oh, I’m a rabbit, hopping with glee,
In lines of code and changes I see.
Conditions refined, flows adjusted true,
Deployments altered, mapper queries anew.
With ASCII hops and joyful flair,
I celebrate change with a rabbit’s care!
🐇💻

Tip

🌐 Web search-backed reviews and chat
  • We have enabled web search-based reviews and chat for all users. This feature allows CodeRabbit to access the latest documentation and information on the web.
  • You can disable this feature by setting web_search: false in the knowledge_base settings.
  • Please share any feedback in the Discord discussion.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9717200 and e757b29.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • base/src/main/resources/mappers/BlockGroupMapper.xml (4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • base/src/main/resources/mappers/BlockGroupMapper.xml

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (2)
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/material/impl/BlockGroupServiceImpl.java (2)

169-171: Security concern: Remove hardcoded user IDs.

Using hardcoded user IDs ("1") is a security risk. Consider injecting the actual user context.

-        String groupCreatedBy = "1"; // 获取登录用户id
-        String blockCreatedBy = "1";
+        String groupCreatedBy = userContextService.getCurrentUserId();
+        String blockCreatedBy = userContextService.getCurrentUserId();

190-203: Fix incorrect block version lookup.

The version lookup uses the wrong block group ID. It's using the local blockGroup variable instead of blockGroupTemp from the iteration.

         for (BlockGroup blockGroupTemp : blockGroupsListResult) {
             for (Block block : blockGroupTemp.getBlocks()) {
                 BlockCarriersRelation queryParam = new BlockCarriersRelation();
                 queryParam.setBlockId(block.getId());
-                queryParam.setHostId(blockGroup.getId());
+                queryParam.setHostId(blockGroupTemp.getId());
                 queryParam.setHostType(Enums.BlockGroup.BLOCK_GROUP.getValue());
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
base/src/main/resources/mappers/BlockGroupMapper.xml (1)

332-340: New queryBlockGroupByCondition Select Statement Addition
The new select statement effectively reuses the <include> fragments for the base column list and conditional filters (BlockGroupByCondition), ensuring that SQL logic remains consistent and centralized. The WHERE 1=1 clause is a common idiom to facilitate the dynamic appending of conditions; however, if it’s not necessary in your context, consider removing it or documenting its purpose for future maintainers.

base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/material/impl/BlockGroupServiceImpl.java (2)

186-186: Improve null check implementation.

While checking for null IDs is good, consider a more defensive implementation that avoids potential edge cases.

-        if (blockGroupsListResult.isEmpty() || blockGroupsListResult.get(0).getId() == null) {
+        if (blockGroupsListResult.isEmpty() || blockGroupsListResult.stream().anyMatch(bg -> bg.getId() == null)) {

166-206: Consider refactoring to separate concerns.

The method handles multiple responsibilities: querying block groups, filtering by user, and updating version information. Consider splitting these into separate methods for better maintainability.

Example refactor:

@Override
public List<BlockGroup> getBlockGroupByIdsOrAppId(List<Integer> ids, Integer appId, String from) {
    String blockCreatedBy = getBlockCreatedBy(from);
    String groupCreatedBy = userContextService.getCurrentUserId();
    
    List<BlockGroup> blockGroups = queryBlockGroups(ids, appId, blockCreatedBy, groupCreatedBy);
    
    if (blockGroups.isEmpty() || blockGroups.stream().anyMatch(bg -> bg.getId() == null)) {
        return blockGroups;
    }
    
    return enrichBlockVersions(blockGroups);
}

private List<BlockGroup> queryBlockGroups(List<Integer> ids, Integer appId, String blockCreatedBy, String groupCreatedBy) {
    if (ids != null) {
        return queryByIds(ids, blockCreatedBy, groupCreatedBy);
    }
    if (appId != null) {
        return blockGroupMapper.queryBlockGroupByAppId(appId, blockCreatedBy, groupCreatedBy);
    }
    return blockGroupMapper.queryAllBlockGroupAndBlock(blockCreatedBy, groupCreatedBy);
}

private List<BlockGroup> enrichBlockVersions(List<BlockGroup> blockGroups) {
    for (BlockGroup blockGroup : blockGroups) {
        enrichBlockVersionsForGroup(blockGroup);
    }
    return blockGroups;
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d94f8d9 and 9717200.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/material/impl/BlockGroupServiceImpl.java (1 hunks)
  • base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/material/impl/BlockServiceImpl.java (0 hunks)
  • base/src/main/resources/mappers/BlockGroupMapper.xml (2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/material/impl/BlockServiceImpl.java
🔇 Additional comments (1)
base/src/main/resources/mappers/BlockGroupMapper.xml (1)

314-321: Simplify and Validate Conditional Logic in <choose> Block
The refactored <choose> structure simplifies the control flow by consolidating the conditions for handling blockCreatedBy. This enhances readability and maintainability. However, note that the original otherwise clause previously checked that all three fields—b.last_build_info, b.content, and b.assets—were not null, whereas the new implementation only verifies b.last_build_info and b.content. Please confirm that omitting the b.assets condition is an intentional change in behavior.

@lu-yg lu-yg merged commit d5dbde0 into opentiny:develop Feb 6, 2025
1 check passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Feb 13, 2025
14 tasks
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Apr 2, 2025
14 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants