doc/proposals: proposal template and validator library proposal #2
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Merged
| type Validator interface { | ||
| // GetFuncs takes a list of arbitrary objects and returns a set of functions | ||
| // that each validate some object from the list. | ||
| GetFuncs(...interface{}) ValidatorFuncs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Would it be simpler to deal with one object at a time? (or async) such that for a given object we get the functions and run them, may make it easier if the validateCRD func conformed to the interface instead of wrapping everything in a closure?
Would this allow for a simpler validate function code?
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
doc/proposals/TEMPLATE.md: proposal template, a slimmed down version of the OKD enhancement proposal templatedoc/proposals/validation-library.md: discusses a possible implementation for an extentensible validation library.Note: see the
Observations and open questionssection ofvalidation-library.mdfor discussion points./cc @gallettilance @shawn-hurley @ecordell