Skip to content

❄️ Mark flaky tests as flaky #3333

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 2, 2024
Merged

❄️ Mark flaky tests as flaky #3333

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 2, 2024

Conversation

perdasilva
Copy link
Collaborator

Description of the change:

Marks flaky tests as flaky

Motivation for the change:
Abate CI issues while we fix

Architectural changes:

Testing remarks:

Reviewer Checklist

  • Implementation matches the proposed design, or proposal is updated to match implementation
  • Sufficient unit test coverage
  • Sufficient end-to-end test coverage
  • Bug fixes are accompanied by regression test(s)
  • e2e tests and flake fixes are accompanied evidence of flake testing, e.g. executing the test 100(0) times
  • tech debt/todo is accompanied by issue link(s) in comments in the surrounding code
  • Tests are comprehensible, e.g. Ginkgo DSL is being used appropriately
  • Docs updated or added to /doc
  • Commit messages sensible and descriptive
  • Tests marked as [FLAKE] are truly flaky and have an issue
  • Code is properly formatted

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from dtfranz and kevinrizza July 1, 2024 12:15
mark flaky tests
2691783 
Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com>
LalatenduMohanty
LalatenduMohanty approved these changes Jul 2, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@LalatenduMohanty LalatenduMohanty left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci OpenShift CI
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 2, 2024

@LalatenduMohanty: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators

In response to this:

/lgtm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

tmshort
tmshort approved these changes Jul 2, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@tmshort tmshort left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 2, 2024
@tmshort tmshort added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 2, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jul 2, 2024
@perdasilva perdasilva merged commit 25aa039 into operator-framework:master Jul 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@LalatenduMohanty LalatenduMohanty LalatenduMohanty approved these changes

@tmshort tmshort tmshort approved these changes

@dtfranz dtfranz Awaiting requested review from dtfranz

@kevinrizza kevinrizza Awaiting requested review from kevinrizza

Assignees

@tmshort tmshort

Labels
lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@perdasilva @LalatenduMohanty @tmshort