Skip to content

Handling update_interval values. #185

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 2, 2019

Conversation

aliabbasrizvi
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Handling update_interval values if they cause overflow or are of the invalid type.

@aliabbasrizvi aliabbasrizvi requested review from mikeproeng37 and a team July 2, 2019 00:48
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.4%) to 98.515% when pulling dce7a46 on ali/interval_fixes into 40b70f3 on datafile-manager.

except (OSError, OverflowError) as err:
self.logger.error('Error in time.sleep. '
'Provided update_interval value may be too big. Error: {}'.format(str(err)))
raise
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we still be raising in this case or just pass it to the error handler? Not sure if raising from another thread might be an issue

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think if we hit either of these errors we should just raise so that the user sees this and fixes it. We cannot leave it silent.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Won't this crash the application though? The job of the error handler in this case would be raise visibility (if an error handler is provided), otherwise it'll just show up in the logs (again, if a logger is provided)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If the value (which is provided the first time) is too high to cause OverflowError or OSError the SDK won't be initialized in the first place.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see. Wouldn't that make this check redundant then?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, it may seem that way, but unfortunately time.sleep has different limits. See here: https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/2.7/Modules/timemodule.c#L1030-L1155

We are not imposing any limit at init after our discussion last week. I was in favor on imposing a 1 day limit, but may be it is ok for time.sleep to fail to let people know that they should change it to a reasonable value. That way they can adjust for their platform accordingly.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Got it. Thanks for the explanation.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Copy link
Contributor

@mikeproeng37 mikeproeng37 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm

@aliabbasrizvi aliabbasrizvi merged commit dd0ff90 into datafile-manager Jul 2, 2019
@aliabbasrizvi aliabbasrizvi deleted the ali/interval_fixes branch July 2, 2019 21:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants