Skip to content

Better exception handling in the SDK #27

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Sep 28, 2016

Conversation

aliabbasrizvi
Copy link
Contributor

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.8%) to 96.888% when pulling d6b4ee7 on aliabbasrizvi/raise_for_event_dispatching into f6b1a76 on devel.

@vraja2
Copy link

vraja2 commented Sep 28, 2016

looks like a python 3 failure

@aliabbasrizvi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Taking a look now.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Sep 28, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.8%) to 96.888% when pulling 94c221f on aliabbasrizvi/raise_for_event_dispatching into f6b1a76 on devel.

@vraja2
Copy link

vraja2 commented Sep 28, 2016

lgtm!

@aliabbasrizvi aliabbasrizvi merged commit 1169809 into devel Sep 28, 2016
@aliabbasrizvi aliabbasrizvi deleted the aliabbasrizvi/raise_for_event_dispatching branch September 28, 2016 01:59
aliabbasrizvi added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2016
* Changing to use objects (#21)

* Moving audiences to object (#22)

* Creating object for groups (#23)

* Moving variations to use objects (#24)

* Updating whitelisting check to precede audience check (#25)

* Updating contribution doc to use CLA (#26)

* Better exception handling in the SDK (#27)

* fix developer docs link (#28)

* Fixing logger (#29)

* Handle exceptions in event dispatcher (#30)

* Fixing parsing of v1 file (#31)

* Bump to 1.0.0
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants