-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
tweaks to look and feel of autodoc #186
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
My only concern is that the methods of |
Oh that's weird... when I was rendering this last night it wasn't doing this. |
I think there was some |
figure.rst | ||
.. autosummary:: | ||
:toctree: generated/ | ||
:template: trace.rst |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@emmanuelle is this the line that's preventing the Figure
methods from appearing? should we have a Figure
-specific template that makes them appear so we can keep the rest of this formatting in place?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I'm working on it, can I push a commit directly to your branch? We need the template to include the members and inherited-members (which was done in the figure.rst
file).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Awesome, and yes, feel free to push to this branch!
I just spent 2 hours trying all possible options with autoclass and autosummary... I pushed to #188 an alternative solution which exposes methods of Figure, and has everything in |
Here's a quick pass of suggested changes to the autodoc layout.