Skip to content

[MRG] histogram nb #2

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jun 21, 2019
Merged

[MRG] histogram nb #2

merged 6 commits into from
Jun 21, 2019

Conversation

emmanuelle
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@emmanuelle
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is it ok to do one PR per notebook? Or for the review is it better to group them? I don't mind.

@emmanuelle emmanuelle changed the title first pass at histogram nb [MRG] histogram nb Jun 16, 2019
py.iplot(fig, filename='styled histogram')
fig.update(layout=go.Layout(
title='Sampled Results', # title of plot
xaxis_title='Value', # xaxis label
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

reading this reminds me that we should use the new-style title object instead of string: https://github.com/plotly/plotly.py-docs/issues/17

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, I will change this. However in px the argument is called title and not title_text should this be changed?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm comfortable with px keeping title as it's designed to be a lighter-weight API :)

@emmanuelle
Copy link
Contributor Author

Comments addressed!

@nicolaskruchten
Copy link
Contributor

💃

@emmanuelle emmanuelle merged commit a6d5252 into master Jun 21, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants