You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The documentation of class io.RawIOBase claims that the 'read' method, when called with a specified transfer size, will perform only one system call ("Otherwise, only one system call is ever made."). However, in these circumstances, it relies on the 'readinto' implementation of a particular RawIOBase subclass. In the case of FileIO the 'readinto' method internally calls '_Py_read' (from fileutils.c) which contains a while loop around the 'read' system call, repeating it if it is interrupted by a signal and the current thread cannot handle the interrupt.
This looping behavior is surely convenient for the user, but it is also troubling in some corner cases. I work with a Linux device driver having a blocking 'read' method, which can only be interrupted by a signal. There are several data streams to capture, so I delegate them to different threads. When I have to interrupt the read (e.g. the machine readout trigger has not arrived) I send the signal to those threads (signal.pthread_kill). I see the driver intercepting it and aborting the transfer, then immediately the '_Py_read' repeats the system call starting another read and, in turn, causing my 'read' call never to return.
CPython versions tested on:
3.10
Operating systems tested on:
Linux
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The retry loop was added for PEP-475 in Python 3.5. The docs should be updated to match the current behavior, I have been working on that in the implementation comments, will work on the more general I/O docs shortly. In particular, read() without a size will read until a zero-length return from the read underlying system call. The code comments in https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/129012/files are up to date for main.
Bug report
Bug description:
The documentation of class io.RawIOBase claims that the 'read' method, when called with a specified transfer size, will perform only one system call ("Otherwise, only one system call is ever made."). However, in these circumstances, it relies on the 'readinto' implementation of a particular RawIOBase subclass. In the case of FileIO the 'readinto' method internally calls '_Py_read' (from fileutils.c) which contains a while loop around the 'read' system call, repeating it if it is interrupted by a signal and the current thread cannot handle the interrupt.
This looping behavior is surely convenient for the user, but it is also troubling in some corner cases. I work with a Linux device driver having a blocking 'read' method, which can only be interrupted by a signal. There are several data streams to capture, so I delegate them to different threads. When I have to interrupt the read (e.g. the machine readout trigger has not arrived) I send the signal to those threads (signal.pthread_kill). I see the driver intercepting it and aborting the transfer, then immediately the '_Py_read' repeats the system call starting another read and, in turn, causing my 'read' call never to return.
CPython versions tested on:
3.10
Operating systems tested on:
Linux
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: