-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.9k
appx test failure on windows: test_denial_of_service_prevented_str_to_int
#96710
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Probably just needs the expected value raised. I expect this test should take multiple seconds if it fails, so having a threshold of ~10ms seems very low. @gpshead, do you agree? |
Also, I doubt #96684 is at all related. This test has nothing to do with the WMI tests or that module. |
Yes I'll just raise the expected value to < 1/2 instead of < 1/8 and see if this ever comes up again. it's a regression test, there was nothing exact about the chosen values. false test passes due to system load or CI timing hiccups are fine. |
… regression test. (pythonGH-96717) A regression would still absolutely fail and even a flaky pass isn't harmful as it'd fail most of the time across our N system test runs. Windows has a low resolution timer and CI systems are prone to odd timing so this just gives more leeway to avoid flakiness. (cherry picked from commit 11e3548) Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org>
…ssion test. (#96717) A regression would still absolutely fail and even a flaky pass isn't harmful as it'd fail most of the time across our N system test runs. Windows has a low resolution timer and CI systems are prone to odd timing so this just gives more leeway to avoid flakiness.
… regression test. (pythonGH-96717) A regression would still absolutely fail and even a flaky pass isn't harmful as it'd fail most of the time across our N system test runs. Windows has a low resolution timer and CI systems are prone to odd timing so this just gives more leeway to avoid flakiness. (cherry picked from commit 11e3548) Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org>
…ssion test. (GH-96717) A regression would still absolutely fail and even a flaky pass isn't harmful as it'd fail most of the time across our N system test runs. Windows has a low resolution timer and CI systems are prone to odd timing so this just gives more leeway to avoid flakiness. (cherry picked from commit 11e3548) Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org>
…ssion test. (GH-96717) A regression would still absolutely fail and even a flaky pass isn't harmful as it'd fail most of the time across our N system test runs. Windows has a low resolution timer and CI systems are prone to odd timing so this just gives more leeway to avoid flakiness. (cherry picked from commit 11e3548) Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org>
… regression test. (pythonGH-96717) A regression would still absolutely fail and even a flaky pass isn't harmful as it'd fail most of the time across our N system test runs. Windows has a low resolution timer and CI systems are prone to odd timing so this just gives more leeway to avoid flakiness. (cherry picked from commit 11e3548) Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org>
… regression test. (pythonGH-96717) A regression would still absolutely fail and even a flaky pass isn't harmful as it'd fail most of the time across our N system test runs. Windows has a low resolution timer and CI systems are prone to odd timing so this just gives more leeway to avoid flakiness. (cherry picked from commit 11e3548) Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org>
… regression test. (pythonGH-96717) A regression would still absolutely fail and even a flaky pass isn't harmful as it'd fail most of the time across our N system test runs. Windows has a low resolution timer and CI systems are prone to odd timing so this just gives more leeway to avoid flakiness. (cherry picked from commit 11e3548) Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org>
… regression test. (GH-96717) (#98197) gh-96710: Make the test timing more lenient for the int/str DoS regression test. (GH-96717) A regression would still absolutely fail and even a flaky pass isn't harmful as it'd fail most of the time across our N system test runs. Windows has a low resolution timer and CI systems are prone to odd timing so this just gives more leeway to avoid flakiness. (cherry picked from commit 11e3548) Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org>
… regression test. (GH-96717) (#98196) gh-96710: Make the test timing more lenient for the int/str DoS regression test. (GH-96717) A regression would still absolutely fail and even a flaky pass isn't harmful as it'd fail most of the time across our N system test runs. Windows has a low resolution timer and CI systems are prone to odd timing so this just gives more leeway to avoid flakiness. (cherry picked from commit 11e3548) Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org>
… regression test. (GH-96717) (#98195) gh-96710: Make the test timing more lenient for the int/str DoS regression test. (GH-96717) A regression would still absolutely fail and even a flaky pass isn't harmful as it'd fail most of the time across our N system test runs. Windows has a low resolution timer and CI systems are prone to odd timing so this just gives more leeway to avoid flakiness. (cherry picked from commit 11e3548) Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org>
Looks like this test is flaky.
Example: https://dev.azure.com/Python/cpython/_build/results?buildId=111460&view=logs&j=c8a71634-e5ec-54a0-3958-760f4148b765&t=599737bc-ad72-560d-1530-0f89b05729e4
Related #96684
CC @zooba
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: