Skip to content

Remove support for legacy bytecode instructions #105705

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 12, 2023

Conversation

gvanrossum
Copy link
Member

(A legacy instruction is of the form instr(FOOBAR), i.e. missing the (... -- ...) stack/cache effect annotation.)

(A legacy instruction is of the form `instr(FOOBAR)`,
i.e. missing the `(... -- ...)` stack/cache effect annotation.)
@gvanrossum gvanrossum enabled auto-merge (squash) June 12, 2023 17:54
@gvanrossum gvanrossum merged commit 9544948 into python:main Jun 12, 2023
@gvanrossum gvanrossum deleted the no-legacy branch June 12, 2023 19:56
carljm added a commit to carljm/cpython that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2023
* main:
  pythongh-105540: Fix code generator tests (python#105707)
  pythongh-105375: Explicitly initialise all {Pickler,Unpickler}Object fields (python#105686)
  pythongh-105331: Change `asyncio.sleep` to raise ``ValueError` for nan (python#105641)
  Remove support for legacy bytecode instructions (python#105705)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants