Skip to content

[3.12] Convert doc.yml workflow to be reusable (GH-103914 + GH-105151) #107042

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 23, 2023
Merged

[3.12] Convert doc.yml workflow to be reusable (GH-103914 + GH-105151) #107042

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 23, 2023

Conversation

webknjaz
Copy link
Contributor

@webknjaz webknjaz commented Jul 22, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Co-authored-by: Adam Turner 9087854+AA-Turner@users.noreply.github.com
Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade hugovk@users.noreply.github.com.
(cherry picked from commit 88d14da)

Use CSV-separated outputs @ get-changed-files @ CI (#105151)

Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade hugovk@users.noreply.github.com
(cherry picked from commit eaa6702)

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--107042.org.readthedocs.build/

@webknjaz
[3.12] Convert doc.yml workflow to be reusable (pythonGH-103914)
a0ab2e4 
Co-authored-by: Adam Turner <9087854+AA-Turner@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <hugovk@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit 88d14da)

Co-authored-by: Sviatoslav Sydorenko <wk.cvs.github@sydorenko.org.ua>
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot mentioned this pull request Jul 22, 2023
Merged
@webknjaz
Use CSV-separated outputs @ get-changed-files @ CI (python#105151)
ee7a788 
Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <hugovk@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit eaa6702)
@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood changed the base branch from main to 3.12 July 22, 2023 14:47
@webknjaz webknjaz changed the title [3.12] Convert doc.yml workflow to be reusable (GH-103914) [3.12] Convert doc.yml workflow to be reusable (GH-103914 + GH-105151) Jul 22, 2023
@webknjaz webknjaz marked this pull request as ready for review July 22, 2023 15:05
@webknjaz
Copy link
Contributor Author

@AlexWaygood thanks for fixing the target branch, I overlooked that..

@ambv @pablogsal could you merge the first batch of the backports plz?

@AlexWaygood
Copy link
Member

@ambv @pablogsal could you merge the first batch of the backports plz?

None of our CI has yet run on this PR. Since this change is purely focussed on improving our CI, it's important for the CI to run before we can think about merging this :)

@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood reopened this Jul 22, 2023
@AlexWaygood
Copy link
Member

@ambv @pablogsal could you merge the first batch of the backports plz?

None of our CI has yet run on this PR. Since this change is purely focussed on improving our CI, it's important for the CI to run before we can think about merging this :)

It passed after closing and reopening the PR.

@webknjaz
Copy link
Contributor Author

None of our CI has yet run on this PR. Since this change is purely focussed on improving our CI, it's important for the CI to run before we can think about merging this :)

Ah, yeah. It's basically a prerequisite for another backport that will add alls-green to the supported branches too and will help @ambv enable the auto-merge feature.

@ambv ambv merged commit 1703262 into python:3.12 Jul 23, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@ezio-melotti ezio-melotti Awaiting requested review from ezio-melotti ezio-melotti is a code owner

@hugovk hugovk Awaiting requested review from hugovk hugovk is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
skip issue skip news
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@webknjaz @AlexWaygood @ambv @bedevere-bot