GH-77609: Add recurse_symlinks argument to pathlib.Path.glob()
#117311
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Replace tri-state `follow_symlinks` with boolean `recurse_symlinks`
argument. The new argument controls whether symlinks are followed when
expanding recursive `**` wildcards. The arguments correspond as follows:
follow_symlinks recurse_symlinks
=============== ================
False N/A
None False
True True
diegorusso
pushed a commit
to diegorusso/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2024
python#117311) Replace tri-state `follow_symlinks` with boolean `recurse_symlinks` argument. The new argument controls whether symlinks are followed when expanding recursive `**` wildcards. The possible argument values correspond as follows: follow_symlinks recurse_symlinks =============== ================ False N/A None False True True We therefore drop support for not following symlinks when expanding non-recursive pattern parts; it wasn't requested in the original issue, and it's a feature not found in any shells. This makes the API a easier to grok by eliminating `None` as an option. No news blurb as `follow_symlinks` was new in 3.13.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Replace tri-state
follow_symlinkswith booleanrecurse_symlinksargument. The new argument controls whether symlinks are followed when expanding recursive**wildcards. The possible argument values correspond as follows:We therefore drop support for not following symlinks when expanding non-recursive pattern parts; it wasn't requested in the original issue, and it's a feature not found in any shells.
This makes the API a easier to grok by eliminating
Noneas an option.No news blurb as
follow_symlinkswas new in 3.13.📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--117311.org.readthedocs.build/