Skip to content

[3.12] DOCS: Suggest always calling exec with a globals argument and no locals argument (GH-119235) #119240

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 20, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
10 changes: 7 additions & 3 deletions Doc/library/functions.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -604,9 +604,13 @@ are always available. They are listed here in alphabetical order.
will be used for both the global and the local variables. If *globals* and
*locals* are given, they are used for the global and local variables,
respectively. If provided, *locals* can be any mapping object. Remember
that at the module level, globals and locals are the same dictionary. If exec
gets two separate objects as *globals* and *locals*, the code will be
executed as if it were embedded in a class definition.
that at the module level, globals and locals are the same dictionary.

.. note::

Most users should just pass a *globals* argument and never *locals*.
If exec gets two separate objects as *globals* and *locals*, the code
will be executed as if it were embedded in a class definition.

If the *globals* dictionary does not contain a value for the key
``__builtins__``, a reference to the dictionary of the built-in module
Expand Down
Loading