-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.8k
gh-128555: Add 'context' keyword parameter to Thread. #128209
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
708127d
to
808fa72
Compare
I wonder if |
Doc/library/threading.rst
Outdated
@@ -369,6 +374,10 @@ since it is impossible to detect the termination of alien threads. | |||
.. versionchanged:: 3.10 | |||
Use the *target* name if *name* argument is omitted. | |||
|
|||
.. versionchanged:: 3.14 | |||
Added the *context* parameter. Previously threads always ran with an empty |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think I'd make this more direct about the behavior change, perhaps something like:
"Threads now inherit the context of the caller of Thread.start instead of starting with an empty context. The context parameter was added. Pass a new contextvars.Context() if your thread requires an empty context."
This default change is a behavior change. Expect that to trip someones existing code up. I don't have the context (pun intended) as to how disruptive that could be. Per the PEP-387 breaking change policy we'd want to wait at least two releases. Which isn't so satisfying given the reasons you want this.
But a compromise could be considered (unsure if this is really wise) if needed: Change the default sooner than the deprecation when running in an experimental free-threading cpython build?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I asked Sam what he thought about making this behavior enabled by default on free-threaded builds and he's okay with the idea. I've updated this PR to take that approach. I think we can wait a couple of releases to decide what to do about the default build. If it seems there is little breakage, we can change the default there too after a suitable period.
* Add ``sys.flags.inherit_context``. * Add ``-X inherit_context`` and :envvar:`PYTHON_INHERIT_CONTEXT`
19d637a
to
6d00c2a
Compare
Merged along with gh-130010. |
Edit: this PR has been revised to make the behavior dependent on the build of Python used. The free-threaded build defaults to inheriting the context of the caller of
Thread.start()
. The default behavior can be overridden by an-X
var or by an environment variable. In the long term I think the behavior should be consistent between builds, both inheriting by default. The flag gives users of the default build an opt-in setting.Add the
sys.flags.thread_inherit_context
flag.This flag is set to true by default on the free-threaded build and false otherwise. If the flag is true, starting a new thread using
threading.Thread
will, by default, use a copy of thecontextvars.Context
from the caller ofthreading.Thread.start
rather than using an empty context.Add the
-X thread_inherit_context
command-line option andPYTHON_THREAD_INHERIT_CONTEXT
environment variable, which set thesys.flags.thread_inherit_context
flag.Add the
context
keyword parameter tothreading.Thread
. It can be used to explicitly pass a context value to be used by a new thread.Make the
_contextvars
module built-in.This was motivated by making the
warnings
module work more reliably when threads and asyncio are used in combination withcatch_warnings
. I'm working on a PR that will makewarnings
use a contextvar for the filtering state.Making new threads inherit context is not a new idea, it was suggested around the 3.10 release timeframe, gh-86981.
📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--128209.org.readthedocs.build/