Skip to content
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
11 changes: 5 additions & 6 deletions Python/ceval.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -786,7 +786,11 @@ _PyEval_EvalFrameDefault(PyThreadState *tstate, _PyInterpreterFrame *frame, int

_PyInterpreterFrame entry_frame;


if (_Py_EnterRecursiveCallTstate(tstate, "")) {
assert(frame->owner != FRAME_OWNED_BY_INTERPRETER);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't you need to _Py_LeaveRecursiveCallPy after this as well?

At least from reading the code of exit_unwind.

Copy link
Member Author

@markshannon markshannon Jan 31, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No. We haven't called _Py_EnterRecursivePy

_PyEval_FrameClearAndPop(tstate, frame);
return NULL;
}

#if defined(Py_DEBUG) && !defined(Py_STACKREF_DEBUG)
/* Set these to invalid but identifiable values for debugging. */
Expand All @@ -811,11 +815,6 @@ _PyEval_EvalFrameDefault(PyThreadState *tstate, _PyInterpreterFrame *frame, int
tstate->current_frame = frame;

tstate->c_recursion_remaining -= (PY_EVAL_C_STACK_UNITS - 1);
if (_Py_EnterRecursiveCallTstate(tstate, "")) {
tstate->c_recursion_remaining--;
tstate->py_recursion_remaining--;
goto exit_unwind;
}

/* support for generator.throw() */
if (throwflag) {
Expand Down
Loading