Skip to content

Conversation

iritkatriel
Copy link
Member

@iritkatriel iritkatriel commented Apr 11, 2025

@iritkatriel iritkatriel changed the title gh-100239: spcialize dict subclasses with no getitem override gh-100239: specialize dict subclasses with no getitem override Apr 11, 2025
@iritkatriel
Copy link
Member Author

The tests will be great again once we merge the fix for #132284.

@@ -971,15 +971,14 @@ dummy_func(
PyObject *sub = PyStackRef_AsPyObjectBorrow(sub_st);
PyObject *dict = PyStackRef_AsPyObjectBorrow(dict_st);

assert(PyDict_CheckExact(dict));
assert(PyDict_Check(dict));
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you also need to change _GUARD_NOS_DICT to PyDict_Check instead of PyDict_CheckExact for this to work but I am not sure.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It does look like it from the code, but I don't see more misses.

image

@iritkatriel
Copy link
Member Author

Copy link
Member

@markshannon markshannon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it worth making dict_subscript non-static to avoid the indirection PyDict_Type.tp_as_mapping->mp_subscript?

@iritkatriel iritkatriel requested a review from methane as a code owner April 14, 2025 15:32
Copy link
Member

@markshannon markshannon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like the test_opcode test needs updating.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants