Skip to content

gh-132983: [Draft] Run refleak tests against _zstd with tests #133282

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 51 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

emmatyping
Copy link
Member

@emmatyping emmatyping commented May 2, 2025

Wanted to see the results of running the refleak tests against the module using GC.


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--133282.org.readthedocs.build/

emmatyping and others added 30 commits April 28, 2025 17:52
This commit introduces the `_zstd` module, with bindings to libzstd from
the pyzstd project. It also includes the unix build system configuration.
Windows build system support will be integrated independently as it
depends on integration with cpython-source-deps.
Also removes module state references from the classes in the _zstd
module and instead uses PyType_GetModuleState()
Co-authored-by: Stan Ulbrych <89152624+StanFromIreland@users.noreply.github.com>
This should avoid races and deadlocks.
The `compress`/`decompress` functions will be moved to Python code for simplicity.
C implementations can always be re-added in the future.

Also, mark _zstd as not requiring the GIL.
Co-authored-by: Adam Turner <9087854+AA-Turner@users.noreply.github.com>
... for `get_zstd_state_from_type`

Co-authored-by: Bénédikt Tran <10796600+picnixz@users.noreply.github.com>
PyModule_AddObject is soft-deprecated, so we should use PyModule_AddObjectRef
Co-authored-by: Bénédikt Tran <10796600+picnixz@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bénédikt Tran <10796600+picnixz@users.noreply.github.com>
We should instead document that to pickle a dictionary a user should use
the `.dict_content` attribute.
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @emmatyping for commit 65542c4 🤖

Results will be shown at:

https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/grid?branch=refs%2Fpull%2F133282%2Fmerge

If you want to schedule another build, you need to add the 🔨 test-with-refleak-buildbots label again.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the 🔨 test-with-refleak-buildbots Test PR w/ refleak buildbots; report in status section label May 2, 2025
@emmatyping emmatyping added the 🔨 test-with-refleak-buildbots Test PR w/ refleak buildbots; report in status section label May 2, 2025
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @emmatyping for commit 6328860 🤖

Results will be shown at:

https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/grid?branch=refs%2Fpull%2F133282%2Fmerge

If you want to schedule another build, you need to add the 🔨 test-with-refleak-buildbots label again.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the 🔨 test-with-refleak-buildbots Test PR w/ refleak buildbots; report in status section label May 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants