-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.8k
bpo-38723: Pdb._runscript should use io.open_code() instead of open() #17127
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
From the io.open_code documentation: This function should be used when the intent is to treat the contents as executable code.
Hello, and thanks for your contribution! I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept this contribution by verifying everyone involved has signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA). Recognized GitHub usernameWe couldn't find a bugs.python.org (b.p.o) account corresponding to the following GitHub usernames: @jsnklln, @wcjsnklln This might be simply due to a missing "GitHub Name" entry in one's b.p.o account settings. This is necessary for legal reasons before we can look at this contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue. You can check yourself to see if the CLA has been received. Thanks again for the contribution, we look forward to reviewing it! |
Thanks for the PR @jsnklln! I assume that you've seen the bot's message about the CLA? It looks like you may need BPO accounts (and signed CLAs) linked to each of the GitHub accounts it mentions above. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a good change, I just have one suggestion to improve the NEWS entry:
Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2019-11-12-15-46-28.bpo-38723.gcdMFn.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-Authored-By: Brandt Bucher <brandtbucher@gmail.com>
Yea I removed that extra account earlier this morning. I just ran the online checker again and the Ni Knights seem to say we're all good now. Thanks for the suggestion on NEWS, I've pressed the button that commits that change. |
Sorry @jsnklln and @zooba, I had trouble checking out the |
GH-17135 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.8 branch. |
…pythonGH-17127) Co-Authored-By: Brandt Bucher <brandtbucher@gmail.com>
…pythonGH-17127) Co-Authored-By: Brandt Bucher <brandtbucher@gmail.com>
From the io.open_code documentation:
This function should be used when the intent is to treat
the contents as executable code.
https://bugs.python.org/issue38723