-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32.2k
bpo-32888: enhance ast.literal_eval error messagess with context information #17662
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
def _convert_num(node): | ||
def _raise_malformed_node(node, context = None): | ||
message = "malformed node or string" | ||
if context is not None and isinstance(node, AST): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is it necessary to check here that node is an AST and not just that context is not None?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder if 'context' is overloaded. Maybe it's better not to add it here to the string passed in, and let the context arg be complete, like "literal expression" or "unary expression arg".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is it necessary to check here that node is an AST and not just that context is not None?
For malformed nodes (manually constructed), it might not be an AST
type, example (already presented in tests);
ast.BinOp(
ast.Constant(1), ast.Add(), "oops"
): "malformed node or string: 'oops'",
I wonder if 'context' is overloaded. Maybe it's better not to add it here to the string passed in, and let the context arg be complete, like "literal expression" or "unary expression arg".
I am not a native speaker, but from the point of messages, it satisfies the expectations and gives the precise location. (+a
=> ValueError: malformed node or string in binary operation context: <ast.Name object at 0x7f02f058d5f0>
). What would you prefer instead of the message above? By the way thanks for your bump on this old PR! I completely forgot it existed since there was no activity :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- I see about the first point.
- On the wording - would it work to simply have "malformed binary operation" in this case?
- My pleasure 👍
Based on changes from #340.
https://bugs.python.org/issue32888