Skip to content

[3.9] Fix compiler warnings in _zoneinfo.c (GH-20342) #20467

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 27, 2020

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

D:\a\cpython\cpython\Modules\_zoneinfo.c(903,52): warning C4267: '=': conversion from 'size_t' to 'unsigned int', possible loss of data [D:\a\cpython\cpython\PCbuild\_zoneinfo.vcxproj]
D:\a\cpython\cpython\Modules\_zoneinfo.c(904,44): warning C4267: '=': conversion from 'size_t' to 'unsigned int', possible loss of data [D:\a\cpython\cpython\PCbuild\_zoneinfo.vcxproj]
D:\a\cpython\cpython\Modules\_zoneinfo.c(1772,31): warning C4244: '=': conversion from 'ssize_t' to 'uint8_t', possible loss of data [D:\a\cpython\cpython\PCbuild\_zoneinfo.vcxproj]

(cherry picked from commit e4799b9)

Co-authored-by: Pablo Galindo Pablogsal@gmail.com

```
D:\a\cpython\cpython\Modules\_zoneinfo.c(903,52): warning C4267: '=': conversion from 'size_t' to 'unsigned int', possible loss of data [D:\a\cpython\cpython\PCbuild\_zoneinfo.vcxproj]
D:\a\cpython\cpython\Modules\_zoneinfo.c(904,44): warning C4267: '=': conversion from 'size_t' to 'unsigned int', possible loss of data [D:\a\cpython\cpython\PCbuild\_zoneinfo.vcxproj]
D:\a\cpython\cpython\Modules\_zoneinfo.c(1772,31): warning C4244: '=': conversion from 'ssize_t' to 'uint8_t', possible loss of data [D:\a\cpython\cpython\PCbuild\_zoneinfo.vcxproj]
```
(cherry picked from commit e4799b9)

Co-authored-by: Pablo Galindo <Pablogsal@gmail.com>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pablogsal: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit be240b8 into python:3.9 May 27, 2020
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-e4799b9-3.9 branch May 27, 2020 21:08
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pablogsal: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

1 similar comment
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pablogsal: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants