-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.9k
bpo-32751: Wait for task cancel in asyncio.wait_for() when timeout <= 0 #21895
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bpo-32751: Wait for task cancel in asyncio.wait_for() when timeout <= 0 #21895
Conversation
When I was fixing bpo-32751 back in pythonGH-7216 I missed the case when *timeout* is zero or negative. This takes care of that. Props to @aaliddell for noticing the inconsistency.
closing/reopening to hopefully fix travis |
@1st1: Please replace |
… 0 (pythonGH-21895) When I was fixing bpo-32751 back in pythonGH-7216 I missed the case when *timeout* is zero or negative. This takes care of that. Props to @aaliddell for noticing the inconsistency. (cherry picked from commit c517fc7) Co-authored-by: Elvis Pranskevichus <elvis@magic.io>
GH-21963 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.9 branch. |
Sorry, @elprans and @1st1, I could not cleanly backport this to |
Sorry @elprans and @1st1, I had trouble checking out the |
GH-21967 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.8 branch. |
GH-21968 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.7 branch. |
…out <= 0 (pythonGH-21895) When I was fixing bpo-32751 back in pythonGH-7216 I missed the case when *timeout* is zero or negative. This takes care of that. Props to @aaliddell for noticing the inconsistency.. (cherry picked from commit c517fc7) Co-authored-by: Elvis Pranskevichus <elvis@magic.io>
…out <= 0 (pythonGH-21895) When I was fixing bpo-32751 back in pythonGH-7216 I missed the case when *timeout* is zero or negative. This takes care of that. Props to @aaliddell for noticing the inconsistency.. (cherry picked from commit c517fc7)
… 0 (python#21895) When I was fixing bpo-32751 back in pythonGH-7216 I missed the case when *timeout* is zero or negative. This takes care of that. Props to @aaliddell for noticing the inconsistency.
When I was fixing bpo-32751 back in GH-7216 I missed the case when
timeout is zero or negative. This takes care of that.
Props to @aaliddell for noticing the inconsistency.
https://bugs.python.org/issue32751