Skip to content

[doc] Update references to NumPy #22458

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 1, 2020

Conversation

andresdelfino
Copy link
Contributor

@andresdelfino andresdelfino commented Sep 30, 2020

Numeric(al) Python to NumPy. It seems the old name hasn't been used for some time.

Automerge-Triggered-By: @lisroach

Copy link
Contributor

@lisroach lisroach left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you!

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit c8bb241 into python:master Oct 1, 2020
@andresdelfino andresdelfino deleted the update_numpy branch October 1, 2020 23:55
xzy3 pushed a commit to xzy3/cpython that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2020
Numeric(al) Python to NumPy. It seems the old name hasn't been used for some time.
@StevenHsuYL
Copy link
Contributor

StevenHsuYL commented Sep 16, 2021

@lisroach
I just found that we're still using "Numerical Python" in Doc branch 3.9.

Should this PR be backported to branch 3.9 as well?
Since "NumPy" is a popular package nowadays, I suggested applying this term in the current Doc version.
Thanks!

@andresdelfino andresdelfino added the needs backport to 3.9 only security fixes label Oct 5, 2021
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @andresdelfino for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.9.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the needs backport to 3.9 only security fixes label Oct 5, 2021
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-28749 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.9 branch.

@andresdelfino
Copy link
Contributor Author

@lisroach I just found that we're still using "Numerical Python" in Doc branch 3.9.

Should this PR be backported to branch 3.9 as well? Since "NumPy" is a popular package nowadays, I suggested applying this term in the current Doc version. Thanks!

I agree, I started the backporting process.

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2021
Numeric(al) Python to NumPy. It seems the old name hasn't been used for some time.
(cherry picked from commit c8bb241)

Co-authored-by: Andre Delfino <adelfino@gmail.com>
@ambv ambv added the needs backport to 3.10 only security fixes label Oct 6, 2021
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @andresdelfino for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.10.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry, @andresdelfino, I could not cleanly backport this to 3.10 due to a conflict.
Please backport using cherry_picker on command line.
cherry_picker c8bb24166e367d449158015cb9b1093f03c7175d 3.10

@miss-islington miss-islington self-assigned this Oct 6, 2021
@ambv
Copy link
Contributor

ambv commented Oct 6, 2021

Ah, forget it, I didn't notice the original date on this PR. Sorry for the noise.

@ambv ambv removed the needs backport to 3.10 only security fixes label Oct 6, 2021
ambv pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2021
Numeric(al) Python to NumPy. It seems the old name hasn't been used for some time.
(cherry picked from commit c8bb241)

Co-authored-by: Andre Delfino <adelfino@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip issue skip news
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants