Skip to content

[3.9] bpo-40484: Document compiler flags under AST module (GH-19885) #22758

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 19, 2020
Merged

[3.9] bpo-40484: Document compiler flags under AST module (GH-19885) #22758

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 19, 2020

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Oct 19, 2020 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

Co-authored-by: Pablo Galindo Pablogsal@gmail.com
Co-authored-by: Shantanu hauntsaninja@users.noreply.github.com
(cherry picked from commit 1559389)

Co-authored-by: Batuhan Taskaya batuhanosmantaskaya@gmail.com

https://bugs.python.org/issue40484

@isidentical @miss-islington
bpo-40484: Document compiler flags under AST module (pythonGH-19885)
a4df257 
Co-authored-by: Pablo Galindo <Pablogsal@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Shantanu <hauntsaninja@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit 1559389)

Co-authored-by: Batuhan Taskaya <batuhanosmantaskaya@gmail.com>
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot mentioned this pull request Oct 19, 2020
Merged
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added skip news docs Documentation in the Doc dir labels Oct 19, 2020
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@isidentical and @pablogsal: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@isidentical
Copy link
Member

Do we needed a backport for this (since it is an enhancement)?

@pablogsal
Copy link
Member

Do we needed a backport for this (since it is an enhancement)?

Changes to the documentation work differently since they are not features. This applies to 3.9 so it would be good to have it anyway

@pablogsal pablogsal merged commit a358a0a into python:3.9 Oct 19, 2020
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-1559389-3.9 branch October 19, 2020 19:29
@isidentical
Copy link
Member

Changes to the documentation work differently since they are not features. This applies to 3.9 so it would be good to have it anyway

Gotcha, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@pablogsal pablogsal pablogsal approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@miss-islington @isidentical @pablogsal @the-knights-who-say-ni @bedevere-bot