Skip to content

[3.8] bpo-38443: Check that the specified universal architectures work (GH-22910) #23452

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 22, 2020

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Nov 22, 2020

As [bpo-38443]() says the error message from configure when specifying --enable-universalsdk with a set of architectures that is not supported by the compiler is not very helpful. This PR explicitly checks if the compiler works and bails out if it doesn't.
(cherry picked from commit 0f20bd9)

Co-authored-by: Ronald Oussoren ronaldoussoren@mac.com

https://bugs.python.org/issue38443

Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:ned-deily

…honGH-22910)

As [bpo-38443]() says the error message from configure when specifying --enable-universalsdk with a set of architectures that is not supported by the compiler is not very helpful.   This PR explicitly checks if the compiler works and bails out if it doesn't.
(cherry picked from commit 0f20bd9)

Co-authored-by: Ronald Oussoren <ronaldoussoren@mac.com>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ronaldoussoren: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

1 similar comment
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ronaldoussoren: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ronaldoussoren: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ronaldoussoren: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit 6e66542 into python:3.8 Nov 22, 2020
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-0f20bd9-3.8 branch November 22, 2020 01:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants