-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32.3k
bpo-43075: Fix ReDoS in request #24391
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
86664c9
Fix ReDoS
yetingli bcb541d
📜🤖 Added by blurb_it.
blurb-it[bot] d79f2da
Update 2021-01-31-05-28-14.bpo-43075.DoAXqO.rst
yetingli 817a2c6
Update 2021-01-31-05-28-14.bpo-43075.DoAXqO.rst
yetingli d4d5b82
Update Misc/NEWS.d/next/Security/2021-01-31-05-28-14.bpo-43075.DoAXqO…
yetingli 735fdcb
Update 2021-01-31-05-28-14.bpo-43075.DoAXqO.rst
yetingli fd9c7fa
Update 2021-01-31-05-28-14.bpo-43075.DoAXqO.rst
yetingli File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions
1
Misc/NEWS.d/next/Security/2021-01-31-05-28-14.bpo-43075.DoAXqO.rst
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
Fix Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability in :class:`urllib.request.AbstractBasicAuthHandler`. The ReDoS-vulnerable regex has quadratic worst-case complexity and it allows cause a denial of service when identifying crafted invalid RFCs. This ReDoS issue is on the client side and needs remote attackers to control the HTTP server. |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This fix is correct, but can't we be more strict to parse the scheme? Do we really want to accept non-ASCII characters in the scheme? Or Unicode spaces? HTTP is like very conservative and I expect the scheme to be only made of ASCII letters maybe with "_" and "-" characters. Is there a RFC giving the grammar for the HTTP Basic scheme?