Skip to content

[3.8] [doc] Be more clear on super() regarding multiple base classes methods (GH-21789) #25707

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 29, 2021
Merged

[3.8] [doc] Be more clear on super() regarding multiple base classes methods (GH-21789) #25707

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion Doc/library/functions.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1627,7 +1627,7 @@ are always available. They are listed here in alphabetical order.
not found in statically compiled languages or languages that only support
single inheritance. This makes it possible to implement "diamond diagrams"
where multiple base classes implement the same method. Good design dictates
that this method have the same calling signature in every case (because the
that such implementations have the same calling signature in every case (because the
order of calls is determined at runtime, because that order adapts
to changes in the class hierarchy, and because that order can include
sibling classes that are unknown prior to runtime).
Expand Down