bpo-44062: Fix PYTHON_FOR_BUILD interpreter lookup for cross-compile … #25951
Conversation
|
Hello, and thanks for your contribution! I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept this contribution by verifying everyone involved has signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA). CLA MissingOur records indicate the following people have not signed the CLA: For legal reasons we need all the people listed to sign the CLA before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue. If you have recently signed the CLA, please wait at least one business day You can check yourself to see if the CLA has been received. Thanks again for the contribution, we look forward to reviewing it! |
|
This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. |
…builds Previously, when running configure in a cross-compile scenario, the PYTHON_FOR_BUILD interpreter could be set to python even if no python is availble in PATH. Now, configure will properly set PYTHON_FOR_BUILD based on what is available in PATH or fail.
…builds
Previously, when running configure in a cross-compile scenario, the
PYTHON_FOR_BUILD interpreter could be set to python even if no python
is availble in PATH.
Now, configure will properly set PYTHON_FOR_BUILD based on what is
available in PATH or fail.
https://bugs.python.org/issue44062