-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32.2k
bpo-44164: document the semantic value of module resources #26280
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions
1
Misc/NEWS.d/next/Documentation/2021-05-21-15-33-03.bpo-44164.dUYTnM.rst
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
Document the semantic value of module resources. |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This description doesn't seem quite right. The text above specifically tries to distance itself any file-system context. The most important thing about resources is they're a way for a package author to include arbitrary content (bytes or text) alongside the modules of that package and for consumers to load those resources. I wouldn't say "resources are implemented by the module loader", but that "resources are presented/exposed by the module loader." Also, since resources can now be directories, it would be inappropriate to say "resources are child files".
I'm struggling to understand what you're trying to explain that's not already explained in the existing docs. Perhaps it would help me understand if you could phrase a question or questions that you're trying to answer.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, so who decides what is a resource? Saying that they are simply presented/exposed by the loader seems to imply that the loader makes no decision about this and simply exposes them.
Hence the "Generally", but when can they be directories? AFAIK,
Traversable
purposely avoids answering the question on whether a traversable is a resource or not. From my understanding, the only canonical way to know this is to callreader.is_resource
.TraversableResources
seems to disagree with you here that directories can be resources.cpython/Lib/importlib/abc.py
Line 439 in 490b638
But anyway, here I probably should give concrete examples instead of saying generally. Most people will only care about
SourceFileLoader
,zipimporter
, etc.The question would be "What is the semantic value of resources?", and because the answer essentially is that it is up to the loader, it would be followed up by "What does that mean in practice?".