Skip to content

bpo-44164: document the semantic value of module resources #26280

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions Doc/library/importlib.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -851,6 +851,10 @@ Resources are roughly akin to files inside directories, though it's important
to keep in mind that this is just a metaphor. Resources and packages **do
not** have to exist as physical files and directories on the file system.

Resources have no semantics associated with them, they are an abstract concept
implemented by the module loader. Generally, in a file-system context, resources
are considered the child files in a module directory.
Comment on lines +854 to +856
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This description doesn't seem quite right. The text above specifically tries to distance itself any file-system context. The most important thing about resources is they're a way for a package author to include arbitrary content (bytes or text) alongside the modules of that package and for consumers to load those resources. I wouldn't say "resources are implemented by the module loader", but that "resources are presented/exposed by the module loader." Also, since resources can now be directories, it would be inappropriate to say "resources are child files".

I'm struggling to understand what you're trying to explain that's not already explained in the existing docs. Perhaps it would help me understand if you could phrase a question or questions that you're trying to answer.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wouldn't say "resources are implemented by the module loader", but that "resources are presented/exposed by the module loader."

Okay, so who decides what is a resource? Saying that they are simply presented/exposed by the loader seems to imply that the loader makes no decision about this and simply exposes them.

Also, since resources can now be directories, it would be inappropriate to say "resources are child files".

Hence the "Generally", but when can they be directories? AFAIK, Traversable purposely avoids answering the question on whether a traversable is a resource or not. From my understanding, the only canonical way to know this is to call reader.is_resource.
TraversableResources seems to disagree with you here that directories can be resources.

return self.files().joinpath(path).is_file()

But anyway, here I probably should give concrete examples instead of saying generally. Most people will only care about SourceFileLoader, zipimporter, etc.

I'm struggling to understand what you're trying to explain that's not already explained in the existing docs. Perhaps it would help me understand if you could phrase a question or questions that you're trying to answer.

The question would be "What is the semantic value of resources?", and because the answer essentially is that it is up to the loader, it would be followed up by "What does that mean in practice?".


.. note::

This module provides functionality similar to `pkg_resources
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
Document the semantic value of module resources.