-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.8k
bpo-45339: Allow user to specify Thread class for use with ThreadPoolExecutor #28640
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Currently the only way to use a custom thread class with the ThreadPoolExecutor is extend the class and override the private method _adjust_thread_count(), which means reproducing (basically, copying and pasting) the body of that method into application code. This change would allow the thread class to be specified when the ThreadPoolExecutor is instantiated, allowing for more composable use.
Hello, and thanks for your contribution! I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept this contribution by verifying everyone involved has signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA). Recognized GitHub usernameWe couldn't find a bugs.python.org (b.p.o) account corresponding to the following GitHub usernames: This might be simply due to a missing "GitHub Name" entry in one's b.p.o account settings. This is necessary for legal reasons before we can look at this contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue. You can check yourself to see if the CLA has been received. Thanks again for the contribution, we look forward to reviewing it! |
Hi @erickpeirson could you open an issue on https://bugs.python.org for discussion? 😊 |
|
This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This also needs to be documented in the concurrent.futures documentation.
(There are also concerns on the issue about whether we should do this at all, but that should be discussed only on the issue.)
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
Currently the only way to use a custom thread class with the ThreadPoolExecutor is extend the class and override the private method _adjust_thread_count(), which means reproducing (basically, copying and pasting) the body of that method into application code. This change would allow the thread class to be specified when the ThreadPoolExecutor is instantiated, allowing for more composable use. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The NEWS entry should describe the change, not argue for it.
Currently the only way to use a custom thread class with the ThreadPoolExecutor is extend the class and override the private method _adjust_thread_count(), which means reproducing (basically, copying and pasting) the body of that method into application code. This change would allow the thread class to be specified when the ThreadPoolExecutor is instantiated, allowing for more composable use. | |
Add ``thread_class`` parameter to `:class:concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor`. |
Currently the only way to use a custom thread class with the ThreadPoolExecutor is extend the class and override the private method _adjust_thread_count(), which means reproducing (basically, copying and pasting) the body of that method into application code. This change would allow the thread class to be specified when the ThreadPoolExecutor is instantiated, allowing for more composable use.
I couldn't find anything in https://bugs.python.org covering this particular issue; happy to go back and create one (and beg your forgiveness for jumping the gun).
https://bugs.python.org/issue45339