Skip to content

[3.6] bpo-18533: Avoid RecursionError from repr() of recursive dictview (GH-4823) #5348

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 26, 2018

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Jan 26, 2018

dictview_repr(): Use a Py_ReprEnter() / Py_ReprLeave() pair to check
for recursion, and produce "..." if so.

test_recursive_repr(): Check for the string rather than a
RecursionError. (Test cannot be any tighter as contents are
implementation-dependent.)

test_deeply_nested_repr(): Add new test, replacing the original
test_recursive_repr(). It checks that a RecursionError is raised in
the case of a non-recursive but deeply nested structure. (Very
similar to what test_repr_deep() in test/test_dict.py does for a
normal dict.)

OrderedDictTests: Add new test case, to test behavior on OrderedDict
instances containing their own values() or items().
(cherry picked from commit d7773d9)

https://bugs.python.org/issue18533

…thonGH-4823)

dictview_repr(): Use a Py_ReprEnter() / Py_ReprLeave() pair to check
for recursion, and produce "..." if so.

test_recursive_repr(): Check for the string rather than a
RecursionError.  (Test cannot be any tighter as contents are
implementation-dependent.)

test_deeply_nested_repr(): Add new test, replacing the original
test_recursive_repr().  It checks that a RecursionError is raised in
the case of a non-recursive but deeply nested structure.  (Very
similar to what test_repr_deep() in test/test_dict.py does for a
normal dict.)

OrderedDictTests: Add new test case, to test behavior on OrderedDict
instances containing their own values() or items().
(cherry picked from commit d7773d9)
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bennorth and @orsenthil: Backport status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks!

@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-d7773d9-3.6 branch February 26, 2018 14:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type-feature A feature request or enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants