Skip to content

bpo-29950: Rename SlotWrapperType to WrapperDescriptorType #926

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 25, 2017
Merged

bpo-29950: Rename SlotWrapperType to WrapperDescriptorType #926

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 25, 2017

Conversation

DimitrisJim
Copy link
Contributor

@DimitrisJim DimitrisJim commented Mar 31, 2017

The name SlotWrapperType was added in bpo-29377 but it added the type based on the repr of the object instead of it's type as type(object.__init__) results in. PR changes this to WrapperDescriptorType to avoid and any unecessary confusion down the line.

@mention-bot
Copy link

@DimitrisJim, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @ethanfurman, @1st1 and @ericvsmith to be potential reviewers.

@ilevkivskyi
Copy link
Member

This PR may break typing module. If you really would like to make this change, then please also submit a PR to upstream typing repo.

@DimitrisJim
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ilevkivskyi Yes, I was planning on doing that. I'll open a PR shortly.

@ilevkivskyi
Copy link
Member

I just merged the typing PR, I think this PR could be merged as well.

@DimitrisJim DimitrisJim changed the title bpo:29950: Rename SlotWrapperType to WrapperDescriptorType bpo-29950: Rename SlotWrapperType to WrapperDescriptorType Apr 18, 2017
@berkerpeksag berkerpeksag merged commit 08c1601 into python:master Apr 25, 2017
@berkerpeksag
Copy link
Member

Oops, sorry I missed the typo in the commit message. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type-feature A feature request or enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants