Skip to content

[3.7] bpo-34783: Disable test_nonexisting_script for macOS framework builds (GH-9831) #9832

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 13, 2018

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Oct 13, 2018

With macOS framework builds, test case test_nonexisting_script in
test_nonexisting_script fails because the test case assumes that
the file name in sys.executable will appear in the error message.
For macOS framework builds, sys.executable is the file name of the
stub launcher and its file name bears no relationship to the file
name of the actual python executable. For now, skip the test in
this case.
(cherry picked from commit f6c29a6)

Co-authored-by: Ned Deily nad@python.org

https://bugs.python.org/issue34783

…pythonGH-9831)

With macOS framework builds, test case test_nonexisting_script in
test_nonexisting_script fails because the test case assumes that
the file name in sys.executable will appear in the error message.
For macOS framework builds, sys.executable is the file name of the
stub launcher and its file name bears no relationship to the file
name of the actual python executable.  For now, skip the test in
this case.
(cherry picked from commit f6c29a6)

Co-authored-by: Ned Deily <nad@python.org>
@ned-deily ned-deily merged commit 5d8ef8b into python:3.7 Oct 13, 2018
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-f6c29a6-3.7 branch October 13, 2018 04:07
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ned-deily: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
skip news tests Tests in the Lib/test dir
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants