Skip to content

Make ClassDef.metaclass an Expression #3848

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 30, 2017
Merged

Conversation

elazarg
Copy link
Contributor

@elazarg elazarg commented Aug 19, 2017

Fix #3847.

@ilevkivskyi
Copy link
Member

You have another PR #3842 that will have conflicts with this one, which one should be considered first?

@elazarg
Copy link
Contributor Author

elazarg commented Aug 19, 2017

This one. #3847 should be easier and cleaner afterwards. Should I close it for now?

@ilevkivskyi
Copy link
Member

Should I close it for now?

No, it can be left open, but please don't rebase it afterwards, merge master instead.

@ilevkivskyi
Copy link
Member

I will take a look at this later, sorry, don't have time now.

@ilevkivskyi ilevkivskyi self-assigned this Aug 19, 2017
Copy link
Member

@ilevkivskyi ilevkivskyi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Looks good to me. I restated the Travis build just in case (in particular to test strict optional), will merge this when tests pass (if there are no objections).

@gvanrossum
Copy link
Member

No time to review but the stated goal seems right and the diff looks simple enough, so no objection to Ivan merging this.

@ilevkivskyi ilevkivskyi merged commit 60527de into python:master Aug 30, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants